Citrini's dystopian AI narrative may be wrong, but it could catalyse deeper thinking, policy change

Citrini's dystopian AI narrative may be wrong, but it could catalyse deeper thinking, policy change

[ad_1]

The research firm imagined a tax on the use of AI, and the establishment of a public claim on the returns from AI infrastructure

Citrini Research’s imaginary memo from the year 2028, which pretends to recount how the widespread adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) caused a surge in white-collar unemployment and economic turmoil in the United States, was met by a barrage of criticism last week.

While I found myself mostly agreeing with Citrini’s detractors, I wondered if the pushback would have been quite as aggressive if the little known research firm’s doomsday narrative from the future hadn’t sparked the unnerving sell-off that it did.

Just about every company mentioned in the fictional memo saw their shares wobble early last week – from software-as-a-service (SaaS) platforms such ServiceNow and Salesforce to payments giants Visa and Mastercard and even asset managers Blackstone and KKR.

Decoding Asia newsletter: your guide to navigating Asia in a new global order. Sign up here to get Decoding Asia newsletter. Delivered to your inbox. Free.

[ad_2]

Source link

Posted in

Liam Redmond

As an editor at Forbes Los Angeles, I specialize in exploring business innovations and entrepreneurial success stories. My passion lies in delivering impactful content that resonates with readers and sparks meaningful conversations.

Leave a Comment